|
|
xml-dev
|
|
Last updated: Sun Mar 16 16:54:47 2003
1777 messages (listed by date and indexed by thread) |
Date Index
- Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type,
Ricardo Zuasti
- Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot?,
Klotz, Leigh
- Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism,
AndrewWatt2000
- Byzantine schism,
Didier PH Martin
- Is W3C Losing the Plot?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] inheritance by restriction,
Phil Fuhlman
- inheritance by restriction,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- RE: [xml-dev] xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev]linking, 80/20],
Wayne Steele
- what parsers support xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- xml schema,
Maciejewski, Thomas
- First TAG WD published,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms,
AndrewWatt2000
- ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ...,
Mike Champion
- XLink WG new charter,
AndrewWatt2000
- XLink and XForms,
AndrewWatt2000
- [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released,
Bruno Dumon
- conversion of XML to DBF,
Valeri.Kireitchik
- RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Why is there no schema for RSS?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Klotz, Leigh
- Used the Amazon XML toolkit?,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Dare Obasanjo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Klotz, Leigh
- RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Linking global context,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools,
Dare Obasanjo
- problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser,
Daben Liu
- FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002,
Karl F. Best
- Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG,
Raghava Krishna (CTC)
- RE: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list,
Jeff Lowery
- Getting dropped off the mail list,
Jeff Lowery
- ASP XML help?,
dale
- Absolute and relative names,
John Cowan
- Another Newby question,
Carlos Vicente
- Re: [xml-dev] IBM Spam?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: Re: [xml-dev] How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema?,
H.-Gerd Rosarius
- How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema?,
H.-Gerd Rosarius
- IBM Spam?,
AndrewWatt2000
- test post - please ignore,
John Evdemon
- RE: [xml-dev] XML parsers acceptance,
Klotz, Leigh
- XML parsers acceptance,
Naren Koka
- IETF XML principles draft,
Tim Bray
- FW: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?),
Keith W. Boone
- [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando),
Ken North
- namespaces and entities: a thought experiment,
adam souzis
- Detection of non-Unicode characters,
Mark Feblowitz
- RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xmlsoftware.com is back,
James Tauber
- RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- How to read a DTD file?,
ajay somani
- Newby question,
Carlos Vicente
- RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Schema Sanity Check,
Steven Livingstone
- RE: [xml-dev] More AI Reading,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- More AI Reading,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented,
John Cowan
- Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step,
Jack Park
- Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step,
bob mcwhirter
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML indexing/search engine,
Roth, Scott (ITD)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- xml digital preservation,
Freschi Marco
- XForms: New & Last WD,
Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Micah Dubinko
- RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- ERPANET workshop Urbino,
Italian.Editor@erpanet.org
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] XSD <any> and namespaces,
Dare Obasanjo
- XSD <any> and namespaces,
Daniel Prager
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Amelia A Lewis
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Keith W. Boone
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM,
Thomas B. Passin
- Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Jeff Rafter
- Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?),
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM),
Ken Sall
- How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
Jeff Rafter
- Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ),
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Christopher R. Maden
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Rich Salz
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM,
Rich Salz
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
W. E. Perry
- Hobbsian processes,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Paul Prescod
- RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Miles Sabin
- RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Didier PH Martin
- [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?,
Roger L. Costello
- Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM,
Jeff Rafter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Searching a SinglNode,
Karl Stubsjoen
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
james anderson
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] namespace revise,
Marcus Carr
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- namespace reprise,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Namespace declaration versus attribute,
Amelia A Lewis
- RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:,
AndrewWatt2000
- Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] Newbie confusion with xml,
Mark Seaborne
- XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser,
William F. Gilreath
- Saving XML Docs on web,
Karl Stubsjoen
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Haarman
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Miles Sabin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Paul Prescod
- RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
John Cowan
- RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.identifiers),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re:[xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers),
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers),
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Miles Sabin
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers,
Simon St.Laurent
- Newbie confusion with xml,
dale
- CDATA section,
Yu Ye Zhou
- RE: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Just-In-Time-Trees (JITTs),
Patrick Durusau
- [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.2,
George Cristian Bina
- XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Bill de hÓra
- What is this IDs/pattern rot?,
Uche Ogbuji
- RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20),
Jelks Cabaniss
- RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ben Trafford
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Henrik Motakef
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ann Navarro
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Linking solutions,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] Linking solutions,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Paul Prescod
- RE: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Didier PH Martin
- Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20),
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Amelia A Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Amelia A Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Amelia A Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev]linking, 80/20],
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Amelia A Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:,
bryan
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:,
Amelia A Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Erik Wilde
- shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies),
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies),
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies),
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Eric van der Vlist
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Jelks Cabaniss
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Aaron Skonnard
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Aaron Skonnard
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Aaron Skonnard
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re:[xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Mike Champion
- RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Aaron Skonnard
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
- Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20],
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ann Navarro
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ann Navarro
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ann Navarro
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Ann Navarro
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Erik Wilde
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Thomas B. Passin
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Uche Ogbuji
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Architectural Forms revival?,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Jelks Cabaniss
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20,
Arjun Ray
- Fwd: infoset data model,
Simon St.Laurent
- Do sheep dream of electric URLs?,
Danny Ayers
- Announcement: new Grammar Test Pages for XQuery1.0 and XPath2.0,
Massimo Marchiori
- Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2,
Massimo Marchiori
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Dare Obasanjo
- XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?),
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] Hypertext and complexity (was RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Dare Obasanjo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Dave Yancey
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Dave Yancey
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Ranjeet Sonone
- Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Dave Yancey
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Ranjeet Sonone
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Doug Rudder
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Ranjeet Sonone
- RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help,
Ranjeet Sonone
- RE: [xml-dev] XMLHTTP Posts and performance,
McNally, David
- XML-Schema Help,
Dave Yancey
- (Fwd) Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Matt Gushee
- RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Francis Norton
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Francis Norton
- Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Paul Prescod
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces,namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re:,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?),
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jim Ancona
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Bryce K. Nielsen
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Hypertext and complexity (was RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext),
Mike Champion
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML, hypertext,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed),
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] XML is not being Validated against schema...?,
Dare Obasanjo
- XML is not being Validated against schema...?,
SISCO
- RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- XMLHTTP Posts and performance,
Karl Stubsjoen
- RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML Schema for large database,
Bill Riegel
- XML 2002 announces keynotes and early registration discount..save over $300.00 now,
Elledge, Marion
- file system or http,
Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)
- WSFL Question,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Java SAX Speed (Was: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?),
Jochen Wiedmann
- TAG posts draft web architecture doc for review,
Mike Champion
- CfP: Open Source implementation of JAXB,
Jochen Wiedmann
- RE: [xml-dev] Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types,
Manos Batsis
- RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?,
Dare Obasanjo
- Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?,
Roger L. Costello
- RE: [xml-dev] Types (again),
Jeff Lowery
- Transform XML and Stylesheets,
Karl Stubsjoen
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
- W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis,
Bob DuCharme
- Semantic Web Maintenance (WAS RE: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Root Document Node,
Dare Obasanjo
- Root Document Node,
Karl Stubsjoen
- Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types,
Manos Batsis
- SQL 2k or XML?,
Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT)
- Types (again),
Sean McGrath
- RE: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs,
Dare Obasanjo
- P2P and URIs,
Paul Prescod
- RE: [xml-dev] XLink 2.0 Requirements,
Micah Dubinko
- RDDL and RDF and RSS,
Doug Ransom
- away for awhile,
jborden
- RE: [xml-dev] URIs == the Web was: Re: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Duality was: Re: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces,
jborden
- URIs == the Web was: Re: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces,
jborden
- RE: [xml-dev] Analogy (was RE: [xml-dev] quarantiningnamespaces),
SISCO
- RE: [xml-dev] Analogy (was RE: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
| | |
