[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:09:42 +0300
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcJB/Ex7uaw0p9eJRDadn8uoXBQTNwABRV7Q
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
> From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
> Manos Batsis scripsit:
>
> > If the resource is retrievable, it should be the same,
> otherwise we have
> > a huge problem. What is missing from the puzzle today is a clean
> > separation of retrievable VS non-retrievable resources,
> with namespaces
> > being the greatest example...
>
> Strictly speaking there are no retrievable resources. What
> GET does is
> to retrieve a *representation* (possibly one of many) of the resource.
How about non-strictly speaking Mr. Cowan?
Regards,
Manos
|
