xml-dev


FOCUS AREAS \| XML-DEV \| XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK \| REGISTRY \| RESOURCES \| ABOUT

xml-dev

Last updated: Sun Mar 16 16:54:47 2003
1777 messages in chronological order | Thread Index

Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type - From: Ricardo Zuasti <rzuasti@koaladev.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Peter Drayton" <peter@razorsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: "Paul Brown" <prb@fivesight.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Byzantine schism - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Is W3C Losing the Plot? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] inheritance by restriction - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
RE: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] inheritance by restriction - From: "Phil Fuhlman" <pfuhlman@Dexma.com>
RE: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@lehman.com>
RE: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
inheritance by restriction - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@lehman.com>
Re: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@lehman.com>
RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev]linking, 80/20] - From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@hotmail.com>
what parsers support xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@lehman.com>
xml schema - From: "Maciejewski, Thomas" <Thomas.Maciejewski@lehman.com>
First TAG WD published - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink WG new charter - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ... - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
XLink WG new charter - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
XLink and XForms - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
[ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released - From: Bruno Dumon <bruno@outerthought.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@oracle.com>
conversion of XML to DBF - From: Valeri.Kireitchik@SIS.Com.By
RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Naren Chawla" <naren_chawla@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
Why is there no schema for RSS? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Used the Amazon XML toolkit? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re:[xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Linking global context - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@bbn.com>
Re: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser - From: "Daben Liu" <dliu@bbn.com>
FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002 - From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG - From: "Raghava Krishna (CTC)" <Raghava.Krishna@AIG.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Re: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Getting dropped off the mail list - From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
ASP XML help? - From: <dale@qc.aira.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Absolute and relative names - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Another Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@meteo.pt>
Re: [xml-dev] IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: Re: [xml-dev] How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@brainsandbytes.de>
RE: [xml-dev] IBM Spam? - From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@urbanmarket.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema? - From: "H.-Gerd Rosarius" <gerd.rosarius@brainsandbytes.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
IBM Spam? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
OT svg display in IE question, performance - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
test post - please ignore - From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@acm.org>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML parsers acceptance - From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: FW: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
XML parsers acceptance - From: "Naren Koka" <NKoka@sfamipec.com>
IETF XML principles draft - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@meteo.pt>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
FW: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@woc.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to read a DTD file? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
What is this IDs/pattern rot? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@woc.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "William F. Gilreath" <will@williamgilreath.com>
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@oracle.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
[ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando) - From: "Ken North" <ken_north@compuserve.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] How to read a DTD file? - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
namespaces and entities: a thought experiment - From: adam souzis <adam@kinecta.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: XML indexing/search engine - From: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@ipedo.com>
Detection of non-Unicode characters - From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@oracle.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
APEX (was Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival?) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Architectural Forms revival? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Re: RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
XML schema/DTD for Yellow Pages - From: "Andi S. Giri" <asgiri@softsquare.biz>
Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
[OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
xmlsoftware.com is back - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Newby question - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
How to read a DTD file? - From: "ajay somani" <ajay.somani@nwsco.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Newby question - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Newby question - From: "Carlos Vicente" <carlos.vicente@meteo.pt>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@maden.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: "leon" <leon@ipedo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Hobbsian processes - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine - From: Dvir Ben-Aaron <ilug@newmail.net>
Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Ken Sall <kensall@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step - From: Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schema Sanity Check - From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
RE: [xml-dev] More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
More AI Reading - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Lindasphere, XML spaces, RELAX NG ??? (was Re: [xml-dev] A multi-stepapproach on defining object-oriented) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
XML indexing/search engine - From: "Roth, Scott (ITD)" <Scott.Roth@state.ma.us>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
xml digital preservation - From: Freschi Marco <Marco.Freschi@cnes.fr>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednature of DOM) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace revise - From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
XForms: New & Last WD - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>
ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on definingobject-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
URIs and XML Vocabularies As Code Systems (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@woc.org>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
global markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0, death of XLink) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
ERPANET workshop Urbino - From: Italian.Editor@erpanet.org <Italian.editor@erpanet.org>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XSD <any> and namespaces - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
XSD <any> and namespaces - From: Daniel Prager <danielp@deakin.edu.au>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM - From: Sam Hunting <shunting@etopicality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented natureof DOM - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM - From: Margarita Isayeva <isayevam@yahoo.com>
Searching a SinglNode - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@azprogolf.com>
Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
namespace reprise - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
filemaker pro, xml and rtf documents - From: "David Nyberg, M.D." <nyberg@u.washington.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Jon Noring <noring@olagrande.net>
Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@woc.org>
Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDFInterpretation of XML documents ) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: amyzing@talsever.com (Amelia A Lewis)
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@ktlim.com>
xml corpus - disregard - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
xml corpus - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Namespace declaration versus attribute - From: amyzing@talsever.com (Amelia A Lewis)
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re:[xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: amyzing@talsever.com (Amelia A Lewis)
RE: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.identifiers) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev]linking, 80/20] - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
RE: [xml-dev] Newbie confusion with xml - From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@origoservices.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Haarman <mhaarma@socsci.umn.edu>
XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser - From: "William F. Gilreath" <will@williamgilreath.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Saving XML Docs on web - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@azprogolf.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Saving XML Docs on web - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Saving XML Docs on web - From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@azprogolf.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] CDATA section - From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
patterns vs. identifiers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Newbie confusion with xml - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@yahoo.com>
Newbie confusion with xml - From: <dale@qc.aira.com>
CDATA section - From: Yu Ye Zhou <yuyezhou@yahoo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Just-In-Time-Trees (JITTs) - From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@emory.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
[ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.2 - From: "George Cristian Bina" <george@sync.ro>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@ammd.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? - From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>
XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear - From: "CHIUSANO, Joseph" <JCHIUSANO@lmi.org>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces,namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Linking solutions - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Linking solutions - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@ammd.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Henrik Motakef <henrik.motakef@web.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
linking, 80/20 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?) - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
URI types and functionality (Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electricURLs?) - From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Fwd: infoset data model - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Do sheep dream of electric URLs? - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
Announcement: new Grammar Test Pages for XQuery1.0 and XPath2.0 - From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
Re: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2 - From: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@ipedo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@ipedo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: Doug Rudder <drudder@drugfacts.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@ipedo.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Dave Yancey" <dyancey1@hotmail.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help - From: "Ranjeet Sonone" <ranjeet@ipedo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?) - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? - From: Paul Spencer <paul@alphaxml.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext - From: "D