|
XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In a message dated 18/08/2002 22:15:44 GMT Daylight Time, jelks@jelks.nu writes:
XHTML 2.0 seems to be the one bright light amongst the maze of W3C specs
currently in vogue.
Really??
Can you expound on why you believe XHTML 2.0 to be a "bright light"?
For example ... For whom? To achieve what?
Andrew Watt
|
|
|
|
|