[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Paul writes:
> That's fine with me. But let's not pretend that the useful thing
> going on is infoset augmentation. The infoset augmentation is only
> interesting to language lawyers. The CSS-Link *syntax* is the
> relevant proposal.
Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.
(I'm trying to find some pathways between CSS and XSL-FO, since support
for CSS print media is poorer than suppoort for XSL-FO. Making the CSS
explicit makes it possible to use it in XSLT processing to generate
XSL-FO...)
In any case, I think this discussion's just getting started, and
hopefully it'll be interesting.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
