OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> Paul writes:
> > That's fine with me. But let's not pretend that the useful thing
> > going on is infoset augmentation. The infoset augmentation is only
> > interesting to language lawyers. The CSS-Link *syntax* is the
> > relevant proposal.
> 
> Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
> CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.  
> 
> (I'm trying to find some pathways between CSS and XSL-FO, since support
> for CSS print media is poorer than suppoort for XSL-FO. Making the CSS
> explicit makes it possible to use it in XSLT processing to generate
> XSL-FO...)
> 
> In any case, I think this discussion's just getting started, and
> hopefully it'll be interesting.
> 
> 
I think this is the same kind of problem I found when I was trying to 
convert some XHTML strict to XSL-FO.  The post is at

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSL-FO/message/2139

(essentially, how do I map <p class="important warning">...</p> to an 
equivalent XSL-FO without parsing a stylesheet, or equally ugly, the
class attribute.) 
-- 
J. David Eisenberg  http://catcode.com/





 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS