[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
/ "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com> was heard to say:
| Sure, though I'll admit that one of my projects with MOE is supporting
| CSS both as an annotation and as an explicit CSS-in-XML syntax.
CSS-in-XML sounds like a good idea. Let's see, it's a bag of
properties attached to a CSS Selector. (<rant>What happened to the
Last Call comments to rename the "Selectors" document[1] to "CSS3
Selectors". More paperwork to dig through...Sigh.</rant>)
The bag of properties thing would be easy to deal with, but the set of
selectors is starting to look awfully ugly. "nth-last-child()"...Eeek!?
Simplicity is loosing everywhere, ain't it?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | You look wise. Pray correct that
XML Standards Architect | error.--Charles Lamb
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
|
