xml-dev - Re: AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?

Re: AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Rohde@bluebyte.de
Subject: Re: AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:10:59 +0100
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <B3977F23833B8348B9C5732A83A8EFA62157F9@BBMAIL> (message fromSebastian Rohde on Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:32:33 +0200)
References: <B3977F23833B8348B9C5732A83A8EFA62157F9@BBMAIL>

> Would it be a problem to have carriage returns
> within an attribute?

they get normalised to spaces by the XML parser.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

References:
- AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
  - From: Sebastian Rohde <Rohde@bluebyte.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
Previous by thread: AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
Next by thread: Trust
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread