[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Len,
Len Said:
Yes, I realize that people want namespaces in core. It's
a bad idea and if these threads don't get that across
clearly, people aren't listening. There is a lot of
basic work that can be done that never touches namespaces.
Didier replies:
I can say from a practical perspective that namespaces are useful since
one particular feature of XML is precisely to enable the creation of a
new domain language by assembling other domain languages. I do not have
this advantage with other languages and this is probably the biggest
invention of XML. However, the inherent problem with assembling
disparate domain languages is that they may use the same word for a
different meaning.
An other advantage but not actually in the spec is the capability to
relate the namespace to some documentation, a document identified by the
namespace URI giving more information about this
vocabulary/structure/semantics construct set. I cannot easily send a C++
or a smalltalk spec and related document with a C++ or smalltalk program
but I can link a namespace to an on-line documentation. If the whole
community including W3 would simply, for a moment, stop the Byzantine
fights and think in "practical" terms of what can _really_ help the XML
framework users whatever them call themselves programmers or XML
authors, we would progress in the right direction.
(1) even if I could include such links in the headers - but C++ or
smalltalk are not web-based languages
|
