xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming

Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: clbullar@ingr.com ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:30:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: simonstl@simonstl.com ('Simon St.Laurent'), xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B751@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Aug 02, 2002 04:24:19 PM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> The core should be the absolute smallest set of features 
> that guarantee global interoperability.

That would be plain text.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread