xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary

RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Joe English" <jenglish@flightlab.com>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:33:39 +0300
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Thread-index: AcJBTil6j3NFzWMdRH2DBi2C3C+rpQAg9kGA
Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@flightlab.com] 

> "Are X and Y the same URI?" is answerable.  "Do X and Y identify
> the same resource?" is not.

If the resource is retrievable, it should be the same, otherwise we have
a huge problem. What is missing from the puzzle today is a clean
separation of retrievable VS non-retrievable resources, with namespaces
being the greatest example...

Manos

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread