[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan wrote:
> Ah. Then you would forbid a basically no-namespace document that has
> a few xlink:* attributes?
In the interests of consistency and understandability, I think it's
a small price to pay to insist on an additional "xmlns='something'"
attribute when various "xlink:*" attributes and "xmlns:xlink"
attributes are already being added.
--
Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@ktlim.com, UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-
|