[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Agree for XML 1.x. What are the hopes for XML 2.x? -m
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Tim Bray; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented
nature of DOM
At 11:00 AM -0700 8/21/02, Tim Bray wrote:
>I'm on the developer's side. Looking back, the namespace of
>unqualified attributes is just a goof in the namespaces REC. I
>wonder if there's any chance of fixing it?
Unfortunately no. Too much existing software depends on it.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
