xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:26:28 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <3D5C0D91.4080509@textuality.com>
References: <r01050300-1015-5DECD634B07511D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

At 01:22 PM 8/15/2002 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:

>Without going very deep, the current way IMG is done just feels like bad 
>markup design for a bunch of fairly obvious reasons.

If it hasn't been noted, it should be -- that IMG is no more in XHTML 2.0. 
The issue it represents, however, still needs to be dealt with.

Ann

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread