[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
The example was purposely simplistic to illustrate a point. You and Manos have failed to see the point which indicates that it is probably more subtle than I thought. It isn't worth going into a lengthy exposition about though so I'll just leave it at "An identifier is not a location".
Feel free to disagree.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill.dehora@propylon.com]
Sent: Mon 8/12/2002 1:41 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo; 'Manos Batsis'
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
>
> You miss the point. An identifier is not a location.
This is not completely true in the http: scheme.
> I could quite easily come up with two schemas, one with a
> target namespace of http://www.25hoursaday.com that describes
> myself as a GA Tech alumni and http://WWW.25hoursaday.COM
> which describes my CD collection. Now there is no question
> that both of these URLs refer to the same location on the web
> yet neither is there any question that they identify
> different things.
Web dereferencing is lossy; big deal. Be more discerning in your choice
of schema names.
> PS: Case insensitivity is a red herring. The example could
> easily use URL escaping or raw IP vs. domain name.
Perhaps you shouldn't be throwing herrings about then.
regards,
Bill de hÓra
..
Propylon
www.propylon.com
|
