xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 00:08:27 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020821092312.01e6bd90@mail.webgeek.com>

Ann Navarro wrote:

> <personal opinion, not representative of the WG>
> 
> XHTML uses namespaces because it has to. Just as any other 
> spec produced these days has to.

"Ay," Hamlet whined metaphysically, "There's the rub."


/Jelks

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
  - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Previous by thread: global markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0, death of XLink)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread