xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: mc@xegesis.org (Mike Champion)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:32:39 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <J6MIQPIH73PMNMTND0PL06VPJHZWZU.3d5aaf4a@MChamp> from "Mike Champion" at Aug 14, 2002 03:28:10 PM

Mike Champion scripsit:

> May the gods have mercy on our miserable souls! XML was supposed to simplify SGML,
> now there will be a rush to SGML because it is so much simpler than XML :~)

Well, if you devised an SGML-with-default-concrete-syntax version of
the ESIS, I should think it would look pretty much like this.

-- 
There is / One art                      John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
No more / No less                       http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Next by Date: Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread