[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I have seen articles that recommend not to use complexType. Is this still
an issue?
I believe the argument was because of its added complexity and common misuse
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Brown [mailto:prb@fivesight.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Maciejewski, Thomas
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] xml schema
> I was wondering what is going on with xml schema as of late.
> Is this still an accepted substitute for the DTD or is there
> something newer/ better?
Yes.
Seriously, with the maturity of the Xerces2 implementation and the
ubiquitous use of XMLSchema types (in SOAP and WSDL), it has arrived.
-- Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
|
