xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d

Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:23:38 -0700
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <r01050300-1015-C32EC535B45A11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> John Cowan writes:
> 
>>3) Eschew mixed content.
> 
> Is this an absolute must for such RDF interpretation?
> 
> It really seems to highlight that RDF and XML are different planets.

RDF and XML *are* different planets.  RDF is a general-purpose 
knowledge-representation framework that can be serialized in XML; but 
its relationship to XML is not any tighter than any other custom 
vocabulary aimed at any other particular problem space. -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread