xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms

Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:34:49 +0000
In-reply-to: <3D70D0E7.5080204@dret.net>
References: <110.1783f762.2aa0d544@aol.com> <3D6F9C0D.1060309@dret.net> <14k0nu8dlbftej8qcf82t5pojms10u1g2l@4ax.com> <3D70D0E7.5080204@dret.net>

Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net> wrote:

| even easier than that:
| 
| "look into the xlink 1.0 spec"

Which, of course, is where the debates start.  I could say it's all about
naming the names, but that would run up smack against a very deepseated
prejudice.

References:
- XLink and XForms
  - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
  - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
  - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
  - From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>

Prev by Date: Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
Next by thread: XLink WG new charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS