[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Arjun Ray wrote:
> Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net> wrote:
> | i do see the danger of enccouraging people to use non-xlink 1.0
> | syntaxes with this strategy, and please don't bring up the 'how do
> | i recognize xlink syntax' debate again.
> On what basis could one conclude that some syntax is *non*-xlink?
> "You're using non-xlink syntax!"
> "Er... how so?"
> "Don't argue with me! You're using non-xlink syntax, I tell you!"
> Okay.
even easier than that:
"look into the xlink 1.0 spec"
|