[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Like I said, I haven't seen any difficulty that isn't "tempet in a
teacup"-esque philosophical or aesthetic arguments. Where is the so
called DIFFICULTY described in the email snippet you posted earlier.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Putting in a request to go home early is the best way to jinx yourself
and end up working overtime.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:15 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise
>
>
> > I'd be more interested in someone who can point out the the
> difficulty
> > caused by namespaces in XML that don't boil down to
> philosophical or
> > aesthetic arguments.
>
> Right, right. There's no problem there, really. It's just
> "philosophy" and "aesthetics" on which we've wasted the past
> four years.
>
> The wisdom of:
> * Scoped attribute declarations
> * URIs as name components
> * QNames in general
> * attributes left out of the default namespace
>
> is just so obvious, that what were we thinking? (I'm sure I
> left something out of that list.)
>
> I really hope Tyler Baker has found something better to think about.
>
>
> -------------
> Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
> http://simonstl.com may be my URI
> http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
> urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
