xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the

Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: aray@nyct.net (Arjun Ray)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death)
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 07:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <osf6mu45tp3jugedkmhm5cmfjkfhohpt9p@4ax.com> from "Arjun Ray" at Aug 21, 2002 07:26:04 AM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> It really seems that Afs do *not* have to be rediscovered.  They have to
> be reinvented.  Leading edge and all that.

I'm trying, I'm trying, I just don't have tiiiiiiiiiii.............

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
                Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
                Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death)
  - From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread