Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

["Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@protocol7.com>]

> Additionally the XHTML 2.0 WD has no indication that I could find of
support
> for XPointer. One wonders why the primitive # fragment identifier is the
only
> (as far as I could see) fragment identifier in W3C's "new generation"
XHTML?

Just a minor note, there is another fragment identifier occuring in the
XFrames WD, #frames(). Not in the XHTML spec but pretty close :-)

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xframes-20020806/#s_populating

/niklas
www.protocol7.com