[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From: "Amelia A Lewis" <amyzing@talsever.com>
> 3. API users who have generated schemas with attributeFormDefault
> qualified. Testing with namespaced attributes works great, but when
> they try to "simplify the serialization" by using the default namespace,
> everything breaks. This time it's because the namespace isn't declared,
> and trying to explain that elements can be unqualified and in a
> namespace, but attributes can't, is a somewhat painful exercise. Tow
> occasions, one of them a direct result of revision of schema due to item
> #2; after that a different developer was given responsibility for the
> XML problem and the first became a general opponent XML for any use.
Is this just as much a problem with attributeFormDefault as with namespaces?
> 6. Several instances of the use of java.net.URL for normalization of a
> namespace URI that breaks comparability. This leads to explanations
> that "a namespace URI is *not* a [java.net.]URL!"
Could you give some more details of this one?
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
|
