[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20
- From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:58:22 +0200
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721
hello.
i would like to point out again that a solution for the xlink/xhtml
dilemma could be to define xlink as a data model, and to see xlink 1.0
and xhtml as two different syntaxes for this xlink data model (xhtml
would be a syntax with some restrictions). this way people wouldn't need
to worry about namespaces in the markup, and still xlink 1.0 and xhtml
would be based on the same data model.
this approach would make link harvesting harder because one would need
to recognize xhtml as well as xlink 1.0 markup, but at least after doing
this both representations of links could be treated uniformly, because
the are built on the same foundation.
cheers,
erik wilde - tel:+41-1-6325132 - fax:+41-1-6321035
mailto:net.dret@dret.net - http://dret.net/
computer engineering and networks laboratory
swiss federal institute of technology (eth)
* try not. do, or do not. there is no try. *
ps: http://dret.net/netdret/docs/tikrep148.pdf is a proposal for such a
data model, and i am currently trying to convince enough people so that
w3c will consider it as a work item.
|