xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms

RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'David Carlisle'" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:47:57 -0400
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200208301442.PAA01425@penguin.nag.co.uk>

Hi David,

David said:
MathML does not require any linking but allows the use of xlink
simple links in the dtd:

http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter7.html#interf_link

Didier replies:
Thanx David for the info. Now the updated count about the W3C Byzantine
Schism is:
a) using Xlink or allowing its uses as defined in the specs: 2 (SVG,
MathML)
b) not using it: 2 (XHTML, XForm)

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
  - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Prev by Date: ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ...
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread