|
|
Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In a message dated 30/08/2002 15:36:17 GMT Daylight Time, martind@netfolder.com writes:
Didier replies:
Thanx for the pointer. Now the count is:
a) two WG are not using a generic linking syntax (i.e. Xform and XHTML).
Didier,
That may be a slightly unfair way to count. :) ... The XForms WG was originally a sub-group of the HTML WG and the co-chair of the XForms WG is Chair of the "HTML" (sic) WG.
So we may, quite possibly, be seeing the rationale/prejudices of a single individual/group/Group playing out there.
Is it rationale? Or prejudice? ... At the moment I am tending slightly to favour the latter. ... That position is partly arrived at as a result of the weakness of the rationale put forward (so far) for avoiding XLink in XForms.
But dialogue/debate/discussion with the XForms co-chair is ongoing. :)
Andrew Watt
|
|
|
|
|
|