[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
You know, archives can be fun.
Also see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JanMar/0073.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000AprJun/0006.html
Plus and old gem from Simon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/1999JanMar/0004.html
Folks, these are more than 2 and 3 years old. Never dealt with to the point
of usability.
Ann
At 03:28 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>At 03:13 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
>
>>I think Ann may be referring to:
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0158.html
>
>And several others, including:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000OctDec/0123.html
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0169.html
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JulSep/0066.html
>
>Note the dates on these gang, this is not a new issue by any stretch of
>the concept.
|
