|
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In a message dated 10/08/2002 02:14:26 GMT Daylight Time, ann@webgeek.com writes:
While I don't have access to the full (lengthy, repeated often) discussions
currently at home, I do want to step in here and say it's NOT in any way
shape or form "simply an aesthetic issue". There are real fundamental
capabilities that were not addressed in the XLink spec, despite many
comments and protests (in fact the requirements for XLink were rewritten
midstream with a result that avoided some of the HTML WG's requirements).
I'll make an effort to post a concise and complete list of issues that lead
to the development of HLink as an option on Monday.
Ann,
That would be very useful to help tease out the technical issues here in a little more depth.
Andrew Watt
|
|
|
|
|