xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism

Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 23:54:26 +0000
In-reply-to: <40.231dbb0d.2aa125ef@aol.com>
References: <40.231dbb0d.2aa125ef@aol.com>

AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:

| Is there a coherent W3C XML strategy?

 1.  Primacy of W3C XML Schemas.
 2.  Namespaces everywhere conceivable.
 3.  Colonification of all names.

HTH.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot?
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism
  - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS