[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Simon,
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 15:10, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> As long as we're arguing about the Infoset, I have to say that I find
> the decision of XPath to consider namespace declarations something other
> than attributes and of the Infoset to put them in a separate [namespace
> attributes] box to be a painful sign that abstractions are dangerous to
> useful syntax. I have no idea who decided we all needed to be protected
> from namespace declarations this way, but I've yet to see a
> justification for it.
Yes, that's just what I was thinking... Add a shortcut to handle
inherited attributes (useful also for xml:lang, xml:space and many other
situations) such as "@@fooo" which could mean something like
"parent-or-self::*/@foo[last()]", ie the "inherited attribute foo" and
we would have had a simple alternative to access to namespace
declarations...
Eric
--
Rendez-vous à Paris.
http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
