Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers

["Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@humanmarkup.org>]

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>RDF and XML are a poor fit in general, but I don't think it's remotely
>possible to claim that RDF-think is as accessible as XML-think to most
>people.
>

Agreed, but RDF is much more easy to read and visualize than most think, 
which is a bad thing. RDF is not bound to any of it's formal or unformal 
forms, including the XML serialization and that makes RDFers have a 
different view for their data than XMLers have for their own. XML is 
(about) markup, RDF is not.


Regards,

Manos