RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers)

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Too much cognitive overhead. :-)

... although the mixed content thing makes 
sense.  On the other hand, I suspect that a lot 
of content out there won't be RDF compatible.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@dyomedea.com]

You can write it as a fully compatible and classical RDF document
meeting the syntax of the RDF syntax rec or only make sure that it is
easily transformable into such a document with your favorite toolbox...
Between these two extreme solutions there are many things to explore,
following John Cowan when he says: "Unless it contains mixed content,
almost any reasonable XML document has an RDF interpretation"...