[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
How about turning something like this into a finding or NOTE or
something:
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html
Joe defines "sanity" and then says:
"QNames in content are a lot easier to process in a sane document.
Sanity guarantees that a given QName means the same thing wherever
it appears. Any future markup vocabulary which uses QNames in content
should include sanity as an application requirement."
That's a start.
As the idea gains currency we could push towards a new version of the
namespaces spec that encourages (and perhaps one day requires) sanity
everywhere.
--
Paul Prescod
|