xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: dareo@microsoft.com (Dare Obasanjo)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), simonstl@simonstl.com (Simon St.Laurent), xml-dev@lists.xml.org, net.dret@dret.net (Erik Wilde)
In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F7BF@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> from "Dare Obasanjo" at Aug 14, 2002 12:46:16 PM

Dare Obasanjo scripsit:

> I thought the W3C already had a syntax for infoset serialization at
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.html

No, that is a serialization syntax for the Infoset, not for "any infoset".

-- 
De plichten van een docent zijn divers,         John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook.                         jcowan@reutershealth.com
      --Edsger Dijkstra                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread