xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 04:13:00 +0000
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816230611.0249d7a0@mail.milowski.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816221755.026d73a8@mail.milowski.com> <000b01c24546$9ef32f80$6401a8c0@didierhome> <p04330101b982cad47be1@[192.168.254.4]> <5.1.0.14.0.20020816221755.026d73a8@mail.milowski.com> <20020817024254.GB1698@swordfish.havenrock.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020816230611.0249d7a0@mail.milowski.com>

Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org> wrote:

| Since [XHTML 2.0 is] going to face those roadblocks already, there's 
| no significant cost to losing "href".

In favor of silly-prefix:href?

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread