xml-dev - RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.ident

RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.ident

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.identifiers)
From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:52:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <200208201445.KAA23289@mail2.reutershealth.com>

8/20/2002 10:31:47 AM, John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> wrote:


>If you change the id attribute to rdf:id, then this is also RDF.
>Unless it contains mixed content, almost any reasonable XML document
>has an RDF interpretation.

An honest  question, not a troll: what can an RDF processor usefully
do with such a document?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers)
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs.
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re:[xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers)
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re:[xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread