[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Of course that's what I was saying. As Mike Brown put it: "the strings are
> syntactically either an empty string or an absolute URI reference". UNless we
> also change the errata that deprecates relative URIs, in which case we really
> have nothing more than a string with a special set of escaping rules disjoint
> from XML's. Which sounds to me like the boiled down residue of a very bad job
> overall.
I just want to clarify that the VBJ I refer to is not really XMLNS 1.0. I'm
still not so disparaging of what I think was a very honest effort that has
proven more useful in practice than a lot of specs I can think of. It's more
the intersection of this with all the incomprehensible (to me) confusion over
URIs among observers.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 -
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html
Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra
ry/x-jclark.html
Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF -
http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A
1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC
|
