[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
* Bill de hÓra
|
| Hang on a minute. The distinction doesn't exist in RDF. I'm not
| disputing it exists elsewhere.
So we agree.
| In no uncertain terms, the fact that an identifier used in RDF is
| deferenceable is a coincidence. RDF does not have a hypertext
| retrieval model a la the web; this 'feature' has been discussed to
| death on the RDF lists.
|
| What foaf or anything else build on RDF, does with links in the
| interim are their own business, more power to them I say. But when
| it gets to code that infers over an RDF graph, the applications
| you're talking about are working with identifiers.
As far as I can tell you are saying that you agree with the premise of
my posting and that you disagree with the conclusion I draw from that,
but you fail to give any reasons for your disagreement.
Would you mind explaining a bit more? I.e., do you have any point to
make beyond agreeing with me that RDF does not make the distinction?
--
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
|
