xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:13:26 -0400
Cc: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
In-reply-to: <87ofc5tivg.fsf@nwalsh.com>

Norm Walsh writes:
> On the other hand, this is an, uhm, LSI, and is sure to be greeted by
> some with the same enthusiasm as the PSVI :-).

Provided that there's a clear mechanism for serializing the LSI as XML
in some easily processed form (XLink-like or not), I suspect you can
navigate those rocks.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

Follow-Ups:
- SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

References:
- Re: Can XLink be fixed?
  - From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: [xml-dev] PushingSAX events out onto the Web?)
Previous by thread: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread