[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as
> global attributes. I think you're reading far too much into the little
> I've actually said. I'm saying that in the context of a given element,
> attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their
> containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous namespace
> context.
That sounds like a distinction without a difference to me. Precisely what
are you suggesting we change in the Infoset, for example? Currently,
unprefixed attributes have a [namespace name] property of "no value".
What would you like to see it be?
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do
will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking
you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
|
