xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:04:41 -0700
Cc: mimasa@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
References: <96.2ab6b662.2a876dad@aol.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722

AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:

> Does Steven Pemberton's email 
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0158.html) fully 
> summarise the HTML WG's concerns? Or are there other substantive issues? 
> He says there are "many" causes for concern. Can you list those?

There are also several follow-ups to Seven's message in the www-tag 
archive, including one in which I try to fill in the history.  Those who 
care about this issue might want to check it out. -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
  - From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss.
Next by Date: Re: Complex or Simple content usage
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread