OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
  • Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
  • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:02:27 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcI5fGpkHDHSa3EUQgOjfAwad+xPwwAAGudw
  • Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)

> I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as
> global attributes.  I think you're reading far too much into the
little
> I've actually said.  I'm saying that in the context of a given
element,
> attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their
> containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous
namespace
> context.

I'm no namespace expert, but I cannot see how you can do what you
recommend without causing some attributes to unintentionally be promoted
globally.






 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS