[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
- From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:02:27 -0700
- Thread-index: AcI5fGpkHDHSa3EUQgOjfAwad+xPwwAAGudw
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question)
> I'm not suggesting that unprefixed attributes should be treated as
> global attributes. I think you're reading far too much into the
little
> I've actually said. I'm saying that in the context of a given
element,
> attributes should be treated as having the namespace context of their
> containing element rather than treated as having an ambiguous
namespace
> context.
I'm no namespace expert, but I cannot see how you can do what you
recommend without causing some attributes to unintentionally be promoted
globally.
|