[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
This is a known bug[0] which should be fixed in a future release.
[0] http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317353
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Livingstone [mailto:s.livingstone@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thu 8/22/2002 11:56 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check
So I tried the suggestion, but although MSXML 4.0 seems to have no
problem, the .Net version still seems to complain about the <b> element
having no schema :S
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="name">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="first">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:any
namespace="##any" processContents="skip" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="middle"
type="xsd:string" />
<xsd:element name="last"
type="xsd:string" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<name>
<first><b>Steven</b></first>
<middle />
<last>Livingstone-Perez</last>
</name>
-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
Sent: 22 August 2002 19:24
To: Steven Livingstone; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check
Looking at the complex type definition for the ur-type[0] we note that
its {content type} has a particle whose {term} is a sequence whose
{particles} contains a single {term} which is wildcard with namespace
constraint set to any.
In short, the content of a complex type of type xs:anyType is anything
from any namespace. However, the default value of processContents[1] for
a wildcard is strict meaning that a schema must be provided for each of
the elements [or attributes] that appear in the content model.
So you can either provide a schema for all the extra elements and
attributes appearing as part of the <first> element or create a type
whose wildcard has processContents set to skip or lax and use that type
instead of xs:anyType.
[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#ur-type-itself
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#process_contents
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Livingstone [mailto:s.livingstone@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thu 8/22/2002 10:44 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Subject: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check
Do the following Schema and instance look ok?
I keep getting an error saying the "<b>" elements are not
declared, but
the type if first is anyType so should this not be anything I
want??
Tried using MSXML 4.0 and .Net Schema classes.
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="name">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="first"
type="xsd:anyType" />
<xsd:element name="middle"
type="xsd:string" />
<xsd:element name="last"
type="xsd:string" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<name xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="schema.xsd">
<first><b>Steven</b></first>
<middle />
<last>Livingstone-Perez</last>
</name>
Thanks,
Steven
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>,
an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|