[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> I don't see the problem with [having two kinds of names];
> it's up to the application to deal with.
But if different specifications for applications define
different ways of dealing with names in no namespace,
wouldn't we have a recipe for the rampant confusion that
has been demonstrated here and eventual interoperability failure?
--
Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@ktlim.com, UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-
|