[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Seairth Jacobs scripsit:
> I agree. It is a radical change. However, the reasoning behind it was that
> you currently have no way of using attributes defined in the default
> namespace, which seems counter-intuitive to me.
Nothing stops you from declaring a prefix which is equivalent to the
current default namespace, and using that for attributes.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang
|