xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published

RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Ann Navarro'" <ann@webgeek.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:47:06 +0200
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020808091555.00a88270@mail.webgeek.com>



>I suppose the debug process could arguably be harder -- if you debug 
>by validation and not sight, that should eliminate most of it.

Yeah, that's true, although I think that egregious bugs, not to mention
hard to resolve, turn out to be bugs thrown by integration of various
technologies/standards, i.e. xhtml with css1, with ecmascript etc. And
this still seems to be more of an art than science to me.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
  - From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread