[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
>
> To parse it for well-formedness, no. To do anything
> past that, yes. It will be in the documentation. As
> Jonathan said, progress is made in the semantic world
> by having a precise formal kind of documentation for
> the namespace. Umm... from genCoding to Document
> Type Definitions. We seem to be deja re-viewing.
>
> Choose:
>
> NOTATION - tell me where the processor for this
> element is (inline)
NOTATIONs are types.
> MIME - give me a name for finding a processor for
> this document is (objects are ortho-docs)
Media types.
> namespace - tell me where to find the instructions
> for building a processor for this guy is, or for
> finding the directions to where the processor for
> this guy is, or where the processor is and
> I can figure out the scope of this guy if you
> did it all correctly
Naah. Namespaces are designed to prevent name collisions and that's it.
Anything else is all in your head.
--
De plichten van een docent zijn divers, John Cowan
die van het gehoor ook. jcowan@reutershealth.com
--Edsger Dijkstra http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
|
