[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Absolutely.
So one thing that Microsoft might do to ensure that
it's customers can choose what is to be documented
in the URzed (it is a document of sorts), is to
provide easy to use tools for creating URNs plus
the implementation for catalogs just in case in
the future, they wish to make them more meaningful
by dereferencing them. That escapes the tautology
of not useful because not available, so not useful.
Tools can constrain or enable. Microsoft chooses
to make these choices available and customers
choose Microsoft to choose its choices because
the choices it chooses are in accordance with
the customer's viewpoints and obligations, aka, policy.
Then Microsoft is an enabler.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
Namespaces in XML is only DNS based if you stick to the "URIs are HTTP
URLs with a fancier name". URNs do not have to be DNS based.
|
